Principle

The Fiscal Stimulus Backlog

A November 2024 read of the US economy: a large tranche of legislated fiscal stimulus had been passed and not yet spent, so the stimulative effect was still ahead rather than behind, against a worry framed not as growth but as a two trillion dollar peacetime deficit at full employment.

The observation

"Right now in the US, I will tell you things feel great. Not only do we have growth and very low unemployment, we have a backlog of fiscal stimulus that hasn't even hit yet. Three years ago we passed nearly 2 trillion in infrastructure bill, it's still being built, nothing's built yet. Two years ago, 52 billion dollars for semiconductor plants, not a single plant has opened yet. A year ago, the Inflation Reduction Act to encourage manufacturing of EVs and other things here, not a single plant open. Last three years in a row we've been the largest recipient of foreign direct investment, and we're ramping in defense production. All of those things are fiscally stimulative, against a backdrop of no legal immigration. That is a pretty good setup." Marc Rowan of Apollo Global Management, speaking in November 2024.1

Legislated stimulus and delivered stimulus are separate events, often separated by years, and markets tend to price the legislation immediately. Rowan's point is that by late 2024 the US had passed an enormous amount of industrial policy whose physical spending had barely begun, meaning the demand impulse was still in front of the economy rather than behind it.

The supporting anomaly he flags immediately afterward: "We've raised rates 500 basis points. What happened? Home prices went up, stocks went up, capital markets are fully liquid. This is a pretty good setup." A 500 basis point tightening cycle that failed to tighten much of anything is hard to explain from monetary conditions alone, and an undisbursed fiscal backlog is the explanation Rowan reaches for.1

The worry is the deficit, not the growth

"Oh, by the way, we have a $2 trillion deficit in peacetime with 4% unemployment. That's a worry."1 The framing is deliberate: a deficit of that size is unremarkable during a war or a recession, but at full employment in peacetime it means the automatic stabilizers are running in the wrong direction and there is no cyclical room left to absorb a shock.

His stated mechanism and timeline: "It's not a short-term worry but it is ultimately a long-term worry. How could it turn into a short-term worry? Usually these things turn into a short-term worry about bond market reaction. Eventually the bond market tends to be the disciplinarian for the world." Asked how anyone would know if it were about to become an immediate problem, his answer is direct: "we don't. That's why it's a worry."1

Adjacent to Dalio

A much harder version of the same underlying concern comes from Ray Dalio, who names an explicit mechanism, currency and bond devaluation as the endpoint of an unsustainable debt cycle, where Rowan offers only the milder claim that the bond market tends to eventually discipline runaway deficits. Read together, Rowan's position functions as the practitioner's version of Dalio's thesis: the same underlying direction of concern, without Dalio's explicit timeline or prescription, and stopping instead at the discipline of staying senior in the capital structure and getting paid for it.

Why an asset manager is telling you this

The macro read is not incidental to Rowan's business, it is the justification for how his firm is positioned. Growth is fine and liquidity is abundant, which means credit spreads are tight and risk is not being well compensated, so the resulting strategy is to stay senior in the capital structure and get paid for structure rather than for taking on subordination. The stimulus backlog itself, infrastructure, semiconductors, energy, and defense, is also the exact demand that private investment-grade credit exists to finance, which makes the backlog effectively the firm's own order book.

Why the claims are checkable

The specific factual claims in this framing, that the infrastructure bill's spending had barely begun, that no semiconductor plant funded by the relevant program had yet opened, and the foreign direct investment ranking, are all dateable against the public record as of late 2024, and nothing here independently verifies them against later reporting.

Practiced by

Connections

Loading connections…

References

  1. 01

    Marc Rowan on In Good Company

    Marc Rowan · podcast · 2024

Related